Mitigation strategies against the phishing attacks: A systematic literature review
A survey of what has actually been tried against phishing and how well each approach held up. Useful mostly as a map of what does not work on its own.
A shelf, not a publication list. These are the papers we go back to on how phishing works, why it keeps working, and what has been tried against it. Each entry says why it is here, and the year is on every one so you can see how current the shelf is.
A survey of what has actually been tried against phishing and how well each approach held up. Useful mostly as a map of what does not work on its own.
Measures how badly people do at spotting phishing email, which is the gap Vigil exists to close. The failure is not inattention; it is that the signals people were taught to look for stopped being present.
The taxonomy paper the rest of the literature cites, and the closest thing the field has to a shared vocabulary for attack stages.
The psychology rather than the technology. Susceptibility is situational, not a fixed trait, which is the argument for asking the reader a question at the moment of decision.